ic S/general/checkmark circled Thanks for subscribing! Be on the lookout for our next newsletter.
ic S/general/checkmark circled
Saved to My Favorites. View My Favorites
Articles / Applying to College / What Happens After You Submit Your App?

What Happens After You Submit Your App?

Sally Rubenstone
Written by Sally Rubenstone | Feb. 18, 2019
How Does the Application-Evaluation Process Actually Work?

How Does the Evaluation Process Work?

Can you break down the entire process of what happens to an application after it's received? Whether there are multiple review levels, whether applications are "graded," what happens if people send additional information later, what happens during the deferral process, etc?

There is no one universal way that admission staff approach the complex application-evaluation process. So any book or article that suggests otherwise should be eyed with skepticism. However, at most institutions, each application (which means all associated materials, of course, and not just the application itself) will be read by a “regional rep" (this is the staff member assigned to oversee applications from a specific geographic area) plus at least one other staff member who reads randomly (meaning that this person is seeing applications from throughout the pool).

Most commonly, each reader makes brief comments on a candidate's strengths and weaknesses (“exceptional essay," “fluffy senior classes"), and each reader assigns some sort of rating ... usually numerical but not always. When I read applications at Smith College nearly two decades ago, our rating scale ranged from one at the top to 10 at the bottom. But I had friends at other colleges whose scale was the exact opposite ... one was the bad number. At some schools, admission readers vote to “Admit" or “Deny." At Smith, each reader gave only one overall rating, but at many colleges there will be an academic rating and a separate personal one.

In my bygone Smith days (and thus perhaps not now), each application came to me with the GPA and standardized test scores (no longer required there) already assigned a numerical value by a computer. So this is where the “holistic" part of the evaluation that we all hear so much about kicked in. I would consider the GPA in context (“Took AP Chem and AP Physics online, not offered at high school;" “GPA unweighted") and the test scores, too (“First-generation;" “underserved school"). Thus, my personal appraisal of these statistics as well as of the writing, extracurricular activities, recommendations, etc. might raise or lower the computer's opening gambit.

You've probably also heard a lot about the admission “committee" and thus you imagine that each student's fate is ultimately determined by a somber group of seasoned admission veterans sharing passionate pleas or acerbic critiques behind impregnable ironwood doors. And, indeed, this can be true. But for many students at many colleges, a decision is made before an application ever reaches a committee. For instance, when I was at Smith, a committee was only convened if the initial two readers couldn't reach a consensus on their own. However, when a candidate was coded with a “hook" — such as athlete, legacy or underrepresented minority — the staff member in charge of this constituency weighed in as well. In most admission offices, the regional rep is in charge of reviewing materials that arrive post-verdict and deciding if these warrant a revision of the initial vote.

When a student is deferred in the Early Decision or Early Action round, the application is reevaluated as part of the Regular Decision pool. Again, the process is not identical at every college, but usually a new reader, who wasn't involved the first time, will be assigned to this second assessment, along with the regional rep. New information is always carefully considered.

Finally, before the infamous fat and thin letters (or the 21st-Century virtual versions) are compiled, there is some sort of “reconciliation" period when admission officials view the prospective first-year class as a whole to see where it meets — or falls short of — institutional needs. These needs will vary from year to year and can be impossible to predict from beyond those closed committee doors. But it can be at this point that students who were once part of the “In" pile get shunted to the “Out." An Ivy League admission official once described to me how she cried when dozens of wonderful but unhooked students were removed from an already too-large class at the eleventh hour.

While I said at the start that there is not a single, definitive approach to the application-evaluation process, there are, nonetheless, a couple of truths that I believe are indeed universal:

1. Even when a student receives bad news, there may have been one admission staff member -- or several -- who adored this applicant and lobbied hard for acceptance.

For example, there was a young man in my orbit who connected so well with his interviewer at an elite liberal arts college that they talked long past his scheduled time slot. But ultimately the college — his first choice — rejected him. His confidence was shot. “I thought she'd really liked me," he lamented. “Maybe I just couldn't judge that." Well, I happened to also know his interviewer. So I called her and asked if she remembered this candidate. “Of course I do!" she effused. She went on to tell me how delightful, intelligent and well-read he was, how thoroughly she'd enjoyed his visit, and how much she'd wanted to admit him. Yet she was outvoted by colleagues who pointed to a course load that favored this student's eclectic academic tastes but fell short on rigor.

2. There is almost always an element of luck involved.

“Holistic" also means “subjective." Many times in my application-reading days, I'd love an essay that a colleague hated ... or vice versa. And although admission officials are supposed to check their biases at the door, there will inevitably be those who favor ballroom dancers over ballerinas or ceramicists over soccer players. So the applicant-reader match can play a key a role in outcomes beyond any teenager's control, despite the best grades and glowing recommendations.


About the Ask the Dean column: Sally Rubenstone is a veteran of the college admissions process and is the co-author of three books covering admissions. She worked as a Smith College admission counselor for 15 years and has also served as an independent college counselor, in addition to working as a senior advisor at College Confidential since 2002. If you'd like to submit a question to The Dean, please send it along here.

Written by

Sally Rubenstone

Sally Rubenstone

Sally Rubenstone knows the competitive and often convoluted college admission process inside out: From the first time the topic of college comes up at the dinner table until the last duffel bag is unloaded on a dorm room floor. She is the co-author of Panicked Parents' Guide to College Admissions; The Transfer Student's Guide to Changing Colleges and The International Student's Guide to Going to College in America. Sally has appeared on NBC's Today program and has been quoted in countless publications, including The New York Times, The Washington Post, USA Weekend, USA Today, U.S. News & World Report, Newsweek, People and Seventeen. Sally has viewed the admissions world from many angles: As a Smith College admission counselor for 15 years, an independent college counselor serving students from a wide range of backgrounds and the author of College Confidential's "Ask the Dean" column. She also taught language arts, social studies, study skills and test preparation in 10 schools, including American international schools in London, Paris, Geneva, Athens and Tel Aviv. As senior advisor to College Confidential since 2002, Sally has helped hundreds of students and parents navigate the college admissions maze. In 2008, she co-founded College Karma, a private college consulting firm, with her College Confidential colleague Dave Berry, and she continues to serve as a College Confidential advisor. Sally and her husband, Chris Petrides, became first-time parents in 1997 at the ripe-old age of 45. So Sally was nearly an official senior citizen when her son Jack began the college selection process, and when she was finally able to practice what she had preached for more than three decades.

More on Applying to College

See all
typing at computer- karolina-grabowska-6958506-resized

Authentic Voice in College Essays

That’s why you want to use your authentic voice when writing any college essay.

So what’s the problem? A student has shared an ess…


College Interview Prep Tips: Brainstorm, Research, Analyze, Generalize

I recently visited Washington University in Saint Louis and was lucky enough to set up an interview. By speaking with peers of mi…

campus gates

Academic Index Scores: Why They Matter and How They're Calculated

Note: Click here for 10 Summer Programs You Can Still Apply For or keep reading to learn more about academic index scores.

8 Podcasts for Students Going Through the Admissions Process

7 Podcasts for Students Going Through the Admissions Process

Podcasts can offer a wealth of information to busy students, particularly when it comes to the college admissions process. We…


Avoid College Application Regrets: Tips For Getting It Right the First Time

Decision Day occurs each year on May 1st and is the deadline for students to inform the college of their choice of their intent t…

Get a student loan that goes beyond tuition.

Ascent offers cosigned and non-cosigned student loans with exclusive benefits that set students up for success.

Explore Now!
Find Your Scholarship

Want to find money for school that doesn’t need to be paid back? Access insights and advice on how to search and apply for scholarships!

Search for Scholarship