|By Yz16 (Yz16) on Thursday, June 24, 2004 - 03:48 am: Edit|
|By Feuler (Feuler) on Thursday, June 24, 2004 - 04:15 am: Edit|
The test itself, prior to its administration.
Aside from that, Barrons. It seems to teach chemistry rather than a test, and the practice exams are quite difficult compared to the real thing, I've heard (I haven't taken the real thing yet). Train hard, fight easy.
|By Lindseylujh (Lindseylujh) on Saturday, June 26, 2004 - 07:45 pm: Edit|
When I took the SAT II Chem, I found that the practice tests in Barron's were closest to my actual score. If you had a good class, I'd suggest just reading Barron's. If you didn't, stick with Princeton Review.
|By Yz16 (Yz16) on Sunday, June 27, 2004 - 12:32 am: Edit|
yay, ok, got barron's.
how about princeton review vs kaplan for practice tests most like the real thing?
|By Lindseylujh (Lindseylujh) on Sunday, June 27, 2004 - 01:56 am: Edit|
Um, I don't know how PR is exactly, but NOT Kaplan. If you have to choose between the two, go PR.
|By Leaf (Leaf) on Sunday, June 27, 2004 - 06:39 am: Edit|
what's wrong with Kaplan? Second time I've seen a post that wasn't too positive on that book...
|By Vermicelli (Vermicelli) on Sunday, June 27, 2004 - 10:22 am: Edit|
Kaplan has too much math on its practice tests compared to the real test
|By Kewlkiwi102 (Kewlkiwi102) on Sunday, June 27, 2004 - 01:58 pm: Edit|
Barrons all the way!
Report an offensive message on this page E-mail this page to a friend
|Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.|
|Administrator's Control Panel -- Board Moderators Only|