Click here to go to the

By Ndbisme5 (Ndbisme5) on Wednesday, May 05, 2004 - 07:21 pm: Edit |

Keep in mind I'm in Pre-Cal Honors

I'm interested in it after researching Nash's biography

By Ndbisme5 (Ndbisme5) on Wednesday, May 05, 2004 - 07:30 pm: Edit |

If it would be way out of my league, what about Fermat's Last Theorem?

By Vinny919 (Vinny919) on Wednesday, May 05, 2004 - 07:51 pm: Edit |

mathworld.wolfram.com <= every math thing in the entire world

By Evil_Robot (Evil_Robot) on Wednesday, May 05, 2004 - 08:00 pm: Edit |

Predicted that every zero on the Riemann zeta function, primes, underestimate of # of primes. Just spouting random knowledge I remember.

By Nabo (Nabo) on Wednesday, May 05, 2004 - 09:22 pm: Edit |

i'm certainly not a math genius by any stretch of thet imagination, but understanding of the riemann hypothesis is the following:

the riemann hypothesis was used to predict the occurance of prime numbers. As numbers get higher and higher, the space between a prime number and the next one also increases. [the space between 7 and 11 is rather small, but for a 18907398217893127893172893 or whatever, the next is quite a bit higher]

Riemann created this crazy formula to attempt to predict how quickly the space between each prime increases as x approaches infinity.

on this crazy function, there are a bunch of zeroes. The zeroes are believed to be related to occurance of prime numbers.

however, riemann only offered this function as a hypothesis without a proof. The debacle about this function is whether its actually true [it seems to be by empiric evidence]

take this little summary as a grain of salt though. im sure another person floating out on the internet would be glad to enlighten us all.

Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information. |

Administrator's Control Panel -- Board Moderators Only Administer Page |