|By Matlm (Matlm) on Saturday, April 17, 2004 - 04:38 pm: Edit|
The AB tests in the PR book seem really easy. The college board practice mini AB test is much harder than what is seen in the PR Tests. I guess it is silly for me to ask which is more accurate, but It is hard for me to believe that PR would have something totally off the marker.
|By Mochika88 (Mochika88) on Saturday, April 17, 2004 - 04:39 pm: Edit|
PR is ALWAYS easier use barrons nad kaplan never use PR they are always way too easy, the only thing I like them for is their nice format and design none, very little of which helps improves your grade
|By Matlm (Matlm) on Saturday, April 17, 2004 - 04:51 pm: Edit|
Thank you for the insight. I will do so at once!
|By Terpfan101 (Terpfan101) on Sunday, April 18, 2004 - 10:18 am: Edit|
i disagree, i think the PR is pretty accurate. The questions seem to be similar to ap questions. in general i think pr's questions are very accurately modeled on actual ap questions. Barrons are always much harder and nowhere near the real ap questions.
|By Yoyomama04 (Yoyomama04) on Sunday, April 18, 2004 - 12:44 pm: Edit|
I thought the PR tests were pretty reliable too - much more realistic. Definitely worth using.
|By Sns22022 (Sns22022) on Sunday, April 18, 2004 - 01:06 pm: Edit|
I just came here after using my Barrons calculus because I'm so frustrated. Some of the problems just don't seem right to me? I don't know...maybe my 98 averages in calculus all year don't mean crap on the AP exam (well, the really don't...lol) Please tell me the Barrons book is a difficult one!
|By Jason817 (Jason817) on Sunday, April 18, 2004 - 01:26 pm: Edit|
PR sucks for calc...use ARCO
Report an offensive message on this page E-mail this page to a friend
|Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.|
|Administrator's Control Panel -- Board Moderators Only|