| By Lisasimpson (Lisasimpson) on Saturday, October 02, 2004 - 04:01 pm: Edit |
find a,b for the parabola y = ax^2 + bx + 3 if the vertex is (2,4)
i have 4 invites left to give, so the first person to solve it can have how many they want and then anybody who verifies the answer can have one too
| By Aspirer42 (Aspirer42) on Saturday, October 02, 2004 - 04:08 pm: Edit |
For another Gmail invite, prove that
(x^n) + (y^n) = (z^n) has no solutions for n > 2, when x, y, and z are non-zero integers.
Show all work.
| By Xasuke (Xasuke) on Saturday, October 02, 2004 - 05:40 pm: Edit |
I'll do the parabola one.. I don't want an invite.
y = ax^2 + bx + 3
plugging in the given vertex (2, 4):
4 = 4a + 2b +3
ok.. and using x=-b/2a for the x cord. of the vertex:
b=-4a
substitute:
4=4a -8a +3
a=-1/4
so..
b=1
finally:
y = -.25x^2 + x + 3
Right now, I'm too lazy to think about the other problem.. Pretty much prove the Pythagorean theorem?
| By Lisasimpson (Lisasimpson) on Saturday, October 02, 2004 - 05:53 pm: Edit |
gracias xasuke
could that be a trick prob aspirer? cuz of x y and x are all 1 then the problem will work no matter what n is..unless i'm just reading it wrong or something.
| By Cherrybarry (Cherrybarry) on Saturday, October 02, 2004 - 07:26 pm: Edit |
where's andrew wiles when you need him?!!!
| By Thermodude (Thermodude) on Saturday, October 02, 2004 - 07:27 pm: Edit |
well...posting a 187 page proof on CC would take a while anyways....too bad Fermat just couldn't have written down his proof somewhere...
| By Ubercollegeman (Ubercollegeman) on Sunday, October 03, 2004 - 01:06 am: Edit |
I'd solve it, Aspirer, but the proof is too long for the contents of this message box to contain...
Report an offensive message on this page
E-mail this page to a friend
| Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information. |
| Administrator's Control Panel -- Board Moderators Only Administer Page |