|By Willywonka (Willywonka) on Sunday, May 23, 2004 - 09:46 pm: Edit|
I was thumbing through the Princeton Review's 351 Best Colleges, and I noticed something strange about the selectivity rating for each school. Of course, I could have looked near the beginning to find out about calculations, but I didn't think of fit.
What I noticed: Washington and Lee had an index of 99, the highest the ratings go. Swarthmore had a 98. Now, that's fine, but the only thing I know about selectivity is the "raw numbers" that say what percentage of applicants were accepted the previous year. I know that Washington and Lee's "raw percentage" is higher than Swarthmore's, so there must be other factors.
Thanks in advance.
|By Tcolgate (Tcolgate) on Sunday, May 23, 2004 - 11:00 pm: Edit|
perhaps since swarthmore is more well known than W&L, they get more non serious applicants, if you will. washington and lee probably only get applications from the best, and from there they have to make a decision. basically, they might have a stronger applicant pool, so technically you have a better chance of getting in, but you are going up against tougher competition
Report an offensive message on this page E-mail this page to a friend
|Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.|
|Administrator's Control Panel -- Board Moderators Only|